Gorman polar form is a functional form for indirect utility functions in economics. Imposing this form on utility allows the researcher to treat a society of utility-maximizers as if it consisted of a single individual. W. M. Gorman showed that having the function take Gorman polar form is both a necessary and sufficient for this condition to hold.
Motivation
Early results by Antonelli (1886) and Nataf (1953) had shown that, assuming all individuals face the same prices in a market, their income consumption curves and their Engel curves should be parallel straight lines. Gorman’s first published paper in 1953 developed these ideas in order to answer the question of generalizing a society to a single individual.
In 1961, Gorman published a short, four-page paper in Metroeconomica which derived an explicit expression for the functional form of preferences which give rise to linear Engel curves. Briefly, an individual’s (<math>i</math>) resulting expenditure function (<math> e ^ i \left ( p , u ^ i \right ) </math>) must be affine with respect to utility (<math>u</math>):
- <math> e^i \left (p,u^i \right ) = f^i(p) + u^i g(p) </math>,
where both <math>f^i \left (p \right )</math> and <math>g \left (p \right )</math> are homogeneous of degree one in prices (<math>p</math>, a vector). This homogeneity condition is trivial, as otherwise <math>e^i \left (p,u^i \right )</math> would not give linear Engel curves.
<math>f^i \left (p \right )</math> and <math>g \left (p \right )</math> have nice interpretations: <math>f^i \left (p \right )</math> is the expenditure needed to reach a reference utility level of zero for each individual (<math>i</math>), while <math>g \left (p \right )</math> is the price index which deflates the excess money income <math>e^i \left (p,u^i \right ) - f^i (p)</math> needed to attain a level of utility <math>\bar{u}</math>. It is important to note that <math>g \left (p \right )</math> is the same for every individual in a society.
Definition
Inverting this formula gives the indirect utility function
- <math> u^i \left (p,m^i \right ) = \frac {m^i-f^i(p)}{g(p)} </math>,
where <math>m</math> is the amount of income available to the individual and is equivalent to the expenditure (<math>e^i \left (p,u^i \right )</math>) in the previous equation. This is what Gorman called “the polar form of the underlying utility function.” Gorman’s use of the term polar was in reference to the idea that the indirect utility function can be seen as using polar rather than Cartesian (as in direct utility functions) coordinates to describe the indifference curve. Here, income (<math>m^i</math>) is analogous to the radius and prices (<math>p</math>) to an angle.
Proof of linearity and equality of slope of Engel curves
To prove that the Engel curves of a function in Gorman polar form are linear, apply Roy’s identity to the utility function to get a Marshallian demand function for an individual (<math>i</math>) and a good (<math>n</math>):
- <math>x^i_n(p,m^i) = -\frac{\frac{\partial u^i(p,m^i)}{\partial p_n}}{\frac{\partial u^i(p,m^i)}{\partial m^i}} = \frac{\partial f^i(p)}{\partial p_n} + \frac{\partial g(p)}{\partial p_n}\cdot\frac{m-f^i(p)}{g(p)}</math>
This is linear in income (<math>m</math>), so the change in an individual’s demand for some commodity with respect to a change in that individual’s income,
<math>\frac{\partial x^i_n(p,m^i)}{\partial m} = \frac{\frac{\partial g(p)}{\partial p_n}}{g(p)}</math>, does not depend on income, and thus Engel curves are linear.
Also, since this change does not depend on variables particular to any individual, the slopes of the Engel curves of different individuals are equal.
Application
Many applications of Gorman polar form are summarized in various texts and in Honohan and Neary’s article cited at the end of this article. These applications include the ease of estimation of <math>f^i(p)</math> and <math>g(p)</math> in certain cases. But the most important application is for the theorist of economics, in that it allows a researcher to treat a society of utility-maximizing individuals as a single individual. In other words, under these conditions a community indifference mapping is guaranteed to exist.
References
- Honohan, Patrick, and Neary, J Peter. W. M. Gorman (1923–2003). The Economic and Social Review, Vol. 34, No. 2, Summer/Autumn, 2003, pp. 195-209 [1]
- W. M. Gorman. On a class of preference fields, Metroeconomica, 13, August 1961, 53-56.
- Antonelli, G. B., 1886. Sulla Teoria Matematica dell’Economia Politica, Pisa; English translation in J.S. Chipman, L. Hurwicz, M. K. Richter and H. F. Sonnenschein (eds.): Preferences, Utility and Demand: A Minnesota Symposium, New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1971, pp. 333-360.
- Nataf, A., 1953. “Sur des questions d’agrégation en économétrie,” Publications de
l’Institut de Statistique de l’Université de Paris, 2, Fasc. Vol. 4, pp. 5-61.
See also
- 14 . 54 International Economics Instructor : Lorenzoni Problem Set File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - View as HTMLCalculate the indirect utility (function of prices and income) for each. agent and for the entire country in the home country under the autarky
- Studies - Banco Central de Chile This paper presents a dynamic stochastic framework, similar to Ostry and Reinhart’s, that maximizes a representative agent’s indirect utility function.
- Generalised Translation of Indirect Utility Functions DENIS File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - View as HTMLAbstract. This paper considers the derivation of new demand systems from existing ones through replacing an. indirect utility function
- An Indirect Utility Model of Multiple Car Ownership and Use File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - View as HTMLAn Indirect Utility Model of Multiple. Car Ownership and Use. Jan Rouwendal. 1. John Pommer. 2. 1. Faculty of Economics and Business Administration,
- Sums and Products of Indirect Utility Functions File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - View as HTMLn indirect utility function U(p, y), where p is a vector of prices and y is the validity of indirect utility functions are very restrictive on the
- Lecture Notes 10 It is also clear that you can derive the cost function from the indirect utility function, and vice versa. If the minimum cost of achieving utility level u
- A comparison of four indirect methods of assessing utility values MEASURES: A self-completed survey that permitted scoring of 4 indirect utility instruments (the Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and 3 (HUI-2 and HUI-3),
- The relationship of medical, demographic and psychosocial factors A comparison of generic, indirect utility measures (the HUI2, HUI3, SF-6D, and the EQ-5D) and disease-specific instruments (the RAQoL and the HAQ) in
- Indirect Utility Maximization under Risk: A Heterogeneous Panel File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - View as HTMLThe curvature properties of the indirect utility function imply a set of refutable by a twice-continuously-differentiable indirect utility function are